Govt behind Parliament attack, 26/11: Ishrat probe office



NEW DELHI: In what is certain to escalate the already vicious fight between the CBI and the IB over the Ishrat Jahan “fake encounter case”, a former home ministry officer has alleged that a member of the CBI-SIT team had accused incumbent governments of “orchestrating” the terror attack on Parliament and the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai.

R V S Mani, who as home ministry under-secretary signed the affidavits submitted in court in the alleged encounter case, has said that Satish Verma, until recently a part of the CBI-SIT probe team, told him that both the terror attacks were set up “with the objective of strengthening the counter-terror legislation (sic)”.

Mani has said that Verma “…narrated that the 13.12. 2001(attack on Parliament) was followed by Pota (Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act) and 26/11 2008 (terrorists’ siege of Mumbai) was followed by amendment to the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act).”

The official has alleged Verma levelled the damaging charge while debunking IB’s inputs labelling the three killed with Ishrat in the June 2004 encounter as Lashkar terrorists.

Contacted by TOI, Verma refused to comment. “I don’t know what the complaint is, made when and to whom. Nor am I interested in knowing. I cannot speak to the media on such matters. Ask the CBI,” said the Gujarat cadre IPS officer who after being relieved from the SIT is working as principal of the Junagadh Police Training College.

Mani, currently posted as deputy land and development officer in the urban development ministry, has written to his seniors that he retorted to Verma’s comments telling the IPS officer that he was articulating the views of Pakistani intelligence agency ISI.

According to him, the charge was levelled by Verma in Gandhinagar on June 22 while questioning Mani about the two home ministry affidavits in the alleged encounter case.

In his letter to the joint secretary in the urban development ministry, Mani has accused Verma of “coercing” him into signing a statement that is at odds with facts as he knew them. He said Verma wanted him to sign a statement saying that the home ministry’s first affidavit in the Ishrat case was drafted by two IB officers. “Knowing fully well that this would tantamount to falsely indicting of (sic) my seniors at the extant time, I declined to sign any statement.”

Giving the context in which Verma allegedly levelled the serious charge against the government, Mani said the IPS officer, while questioning him, had raised doubts about the genuineness of IB’s counter-terror intelligence. He disputed the veracity of the input on the antecedents of the three killed in June 2004 on the outskirts of Ahmedabad with Ishrat in the alleged encounter which has since become a polarizing issue while fuelling Congress’s fight with Gujarat CM Narendra Modi.

Gujarat Police has justified the encounter citing the IB report that Pakistani nationals Zeeshan Zohar, Amzad Ali Rana and Javed Sheikh were part of a Lashkar module which had reached Gujarat to target Modi and carry out terrorist attacks.

In its first affidavit, filed in August 2009, the home ministry had cited IB inputs that those killed with Ishrat in the alleged encounter were part of a Lashkar sleeper cell, and had objected to a CBI probe into the “encounter”.

In its second affidavit, filed in September 2009, the home ministry, irked by the Gujarat government treating the first affidavit as justification of the encounter, said the IB input did not constitute conclusive proof of the terrorist antecedents of those killed. It supported the demand for a CBI probe.

Mani said Verma doubted the input saying MHA’s first affidavit was actually drafted by IB officer Rajinder Kumar, who looked after IB’s operations in Gujarat at the time of Ishrat “encounter” and now runs the serious risk of being chargesheeted by the CBI for hatching the conspiracy behind the alleged extra-judicial killings.

Mani said Verma stuck to his guns even after being told that the home ministry did not need outside help. The former home ministry official said Verma insisted that the “input” was prepared after the encounter

Source: Time of India

Discussion7 Comments

  1. This is a wild conspiracy theory even for Pakistan…let me get this straight, the author wants people to believe that India attacked itself?…this is completely delusional and just because one wacko in India says it hardly qualifies it as a truth that should be repeated…this is exactly the type of story that keeps Pakistan in denial about who,their enemy really is…shame on the author for writing this rubbish…

    • lol it’s funny that anything that supports the pakistani viewpoint is a just a silly conspiracy theory. an old propaganda trick designed by the cia to discredit those trying to get the truth out. do u know what else is a conspiracy theory? the fact that so-called muslim terrorists attacked mumbai. the problem for u is that our conspiracy theory has some actual substantial evidence whereas the official story is riddled with holes. the ironic part is that my sources for this aren’t even pakistani, they’re INDIAN.

  2. This is the truth… As I always say… Truth comes late but comes. Now indians will have to face another truth that india will be disintegrated because of many separate movements (who wants freedom from india). this is truth… it will come late but will come.

    • it’ll be a miracle if they actually face the truth for once. but more likely they’ll deny it as usual and say that he is just a “crazy” conspiracy theorist. add a bit of coverage painting him to be an ISI agent (which they have already done) and voila! instead of realizing the truth and apologizing to pakistanis, they would be calling for our heads (as usual).

  3. Over the past many years, as part of investigations everything happens in Mumbai or attack in parliament is blamed against Pakistan. The sarkar once come to blaming and point scoring blame Pakistan and once it comes to show of muscles says it’s against china. I don’t know the strker is so much feared from Pakistan and can even feel insecure that even Pakistani sarakar can do anything .this Bombay drama was such an incident blamed against Pakistani sarkar and at the end of the day our own sarkar was involved.
    Being a young citizen of junta….I feel don’t play with even an ant ….if Pakistani sarkar is a nuclear weapon state and I think we should not play this types of games with Pakistani sarkar. .
    My eyes are red that my own sarkar did this drama where so many of our loved ones lost their lives. Shabasshhh srakar ….this is really stinging and makes us insecure…anyway we are insecure anyway..where the lives are not safe any one can rape and is protect by the elites….

Leave A Reply